Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
September 23, 2004
Banana Republic Insult

In a recent comment barfly Fran points to one, two remarkable articles and opines with regard to the US election:

“the rising of the Banana Republic”

With a respectful nod towards South American entities I strongly disagree.

If there are comparisons to the US election system these are to be found in places where the US is supporting the implementation of democracy. There, like in the US, every effort is made to make the elections outcome as effortless as possible.

Take a look at Afghanistan, where a distinguished ambassador is continuously consulting with all presidential candidates. In an effort to make it easy to vote, he is tediously working to shorten the ballot list, even if this involves incuring significant expenditures.

After the hourlong meeting last month, the ethnic Hazara warlord said in an interview Tuesday, he wasn’t satisfied with the rewards offered for quitting.

New meetings are said to be scheduled. To guarantee a high voter outcome, some 10.5 million of 9.5 million estimated eligible Afghan voters are registered by now. Efforts continue to additionally register expatriates like Mr. Rahman.

“We are a bit confused about the candidates,” said Saifur Rahman, 52, a Jalozai[, Pakistan,] resident. “Nobody knows what their plans are for our country.”

But he insists he’ll vote. “I’m an Afghan, and this is my right. I will use that right.”

Another good example for a decent election process may be found in Iraq. The voters there will have to cast the ballot on party lists of candidates. To disburden the electorate and to reduce the costs of ballot printing, the major parties are agreeing to form one “consensus list“. The voter’s arduous decision process will significantly lighten as there will be one simple circle on the ballot that may be marked. This entitles the Iraqi voter to exactly the same extensive variety of policy choices the US voter is demanding and given.

The democratic legitimation of the next President of the US of A, Prime Minister of Iraq and President of Afghanistan will be on comparable levels. To liken these with Banana Republic standards is an insult.

Comments

I am not going to waste my time comparing all banana republics. It’s obvious now that Bush is going to win and it looks like Kerry has been chosen, I repeat chosen to lose…
Your country has been hijacked by Corporations and they choose Kerry…and to make banana republic of USA. It’s much easier and they don’t feel they need to waste time playing democracy any more…
I don’t know why and how but I hope Australia will go its own way…don’t ask about foundation for my hope…there is none…

Posted by: vbo | Sep 23 2004 11:19 utc | 1

i disagree w vbo
i believe the future is still ahead, and although bush may remain in power, it is possible that he may not – so it is NOT obvious how things are going to turn out – in my opinion
may the creative forces of the universe stand beside us, and guide us, through the night with the light from above (speaking metaphorically)

Posted by: mistah charley | Sep 23 2004 13:06 utc | 2

damn b, that is some stinging satire!
Well said and oh so true.

Posted by: Dan of Steele | Sep 23 2004 14:53 utc | 3

speaking of banana republics
bbc.com finally ough to accept
that is an annexe of newscorp/foxnews
their pomposity makes me sicker than i already am
basta
still steel

Posted by: remembereringgiap | Sep 23 2004 15:20 utc | 4

“To disburden the electorate and to reduce the costs of ballot printing, the major parties are agreeing to form one “consensus list”. The voter’s arduous decision process will significantly lighten as there will be one simple circle on the ballot that may be marked.”
Wasn’t it, more or less, what Stalin did to Eastern Europe in the late 1940s? Not that I would compare Bush to Stalin; at least, the war was forced on Stalin.

Posted by: Clueless Joe | Sep 23 2004 18:32 utc | 5

It is amazing how Bush’s platitudes endure the burden of reality. Maybe the master platitude is ‘Americans are good people’ and every utterance by Bush, like ‘advancing rights of mankind’ can only refer to this closed circle of self-referential fantasy; as if there is no exoteric meaning outside of the meytonymic loop of ‘all us good americans.’
Amazing because this shit works. The guy’ll be reelected. Amazing.

Posted by: slothrop | Sep 23 2004 21:04 utc | 6

It is amazing how Bush’s platitudes endure the burden of reality. Maybe the master platitude is ‘Americans are good people’ and every utterance by Bush, like ‘advancing rights of mankind’ can only refer to this closed circle of self-referential fantasy; as if there is no exoteric meaning outside of the meytonymic loop of ‘all us good americans.’
Amazing because this shit works. The guy’ll be reelected. Amazing.

Posted by: slothrop | Sep 23 2004 21:10 utc | 7

What would happen if Kerry an Edward resign as candidates?
Would be possible to select another candidates?
There is not alternative?
The World is waiting.

Posted by: curious | Sep 23 2004 21:30 utc | 8

At my house we’ve been comparing the US to 3rd world countries for a couple of years now. I know it’s also out there on the Internet. First world countries take care of their own before waging imperialistic coups all over the world. The US slips slowly in the stats to 3rd world status. And we here are all feeling it because we are not Bush Pioneers.

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Sep 23 2004 22:41 utc | 9

A ‘citizens’ impeachment! Make the repugs in the House and Senate pay! On Nov.2 Impeach Bush and the whole damn lot of them.

Posted by: pb | Sep 23 2004 23:59 utc | 10

The US has the mark of a third world country because of foriegn election monitors.
Things aren’t boding well for the US. China has now moved past the US as having greatest amount of net investment, and a new headline says Europe is starting to outperform the US in jobs.
The decline has started and and I bet the bottom comes fast.

Posted by: jdp | Sep 24 2004 0:08 utc | 11

mistah charley, I would like to share your believes and hopes…but unfortunately I can’t.
Don’t really know what’s happening there in USA but here in Australia we can hardly notice watching news that there is an opponent to Bush in this campaign at all…
I hear from some friends that live in USA and they all say that Kerry does not stand a chance …his campaign is benign like a mint tea and it really would take a lot more to beat Bush!

Posted by: vbo | Sep 24 2004 5:03 utc | 12

Bernhard, lately you have an amazing turn out of great posts, sometimes it is hard to keep up with your productivity – but thanks.
Well, so much for free elections?
Rumsfeld Suggests Limited Iraq Election

Wish I had more time to comment, but am at present extremely busy with work. However I can’t resist to copy this little gem from the daily kos.
Bush press conference:
Talk to the leader. I agree, I’m not the expert on how the Iraqi people think, because I live in America where it’s nice and safe and secure.
The Afghan national army is a part of the army.
By the way, it’s the Afghan national army that went into Najaf and did the work there.
I’ve seen firsthand the tactics of these killers.

Isn’t it great, they even using the Afghan army in Iraq to make free elections possible!!!

Posted by: Fran | Sep 24 2004 5:58 utc | 13

Hesiod is blogging again, mainly about the election. Here a tid-bid to wet your taste.
“Overthrown Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who was arrested by US forces last December, reportedly plans to run as a candidate in the Iraqi elections scheduled for January 2005.
Saddam’s lawyer Giovanni di Stefano told Denmark’s B.T. newspaper that Saddam decided during one of their discussions that he would declare his candidacy for the elections.
Stefano said that there was no law that prevented Saddam from appearing on the ballot. He added that Saddam hopes to regain his presidency and palaces via the democratic process.”

Isn’t reality much more unbelievable than fiction?
counterspin
Then there is this cartoon, not really funny, but it summs this election up pretty well.
here

Posted by: Fran | Sep 24 2004 15:34 utc | 14