Moon of Alabama Brecht quote
August 11, 2004
Rove Trapped on Phoneline to Najaf

For a few moments sanity has -maybe-, -hopefully- resurfaced as US troops have halted their planed total assault on Al Sadr´s fighters in Najaf. Any attack on Najaf´s shrine of Imam Ali, where Al Sadr is trying to give himself the same cloud as Imam Ali himself, would be the equivalent of the total destruction of the Vatican and killing of the Pope by non Christians. US troops, NYT: says, would probably be eager to do this:

… American commanders are anxious to win a high-profile victory after their efforts this spring to oust Mr. Sadr from Najaf’s old city and take control of Falluja ended in truces that did not achieve the American goals.

But maybe the Vice President of Iraq and the high priest of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had a delaying say in the issue, as maybe had some 1,300,000,000 Muslim who regard the ongoing bombarding of the holy Najaf graveyard of 2,000,000 buried Shia by some 5,000 US troops as slightly out of decency.

On a second though, this may not be the real reason to take a break.

Chalabi being back in Iraq and his allied South Iraq Shia threatening succession seem also not important enough to stop Rumsfeld to demonstrate his virility.

The reason for this reaction:

“An armored column idling at the main gate turned around and went back into the camp, and commanders said planning for the offensive had been extended.(WaPo)

looks more likely to be based on this threat of action:

“If the U.S. forces attacked Najaf tonight, we will blow up the oil pipelines,” Sheikh Asaad al-Basri, the leader of the Mehdi militia loyal in the southern city of Basra, told Reuters.

Somebody may be calculating the advantage of the publicity of a decisive victory against Al Sadr versus a hefty increase of the price at the pump. Could this be decisive at the election booth?

How sensitive this theme is, can be seen on today’s action in the oil market:

Saudi Arabia sought to soothe oil markets Wednesday by saying it could immediately pump an extra 1.3 million barrels of oil a day, an increase of 1.5 percent in global output. link

Some people panicked and sold their oil futures even though any marginal expert knows that there is no way for the Saudis to increase production in the short term.

“If they were hoping to break the back of the rally with just that, it’s not going to come to fruition,” said John Kilduff, senior vice president of the energy risk management group at Fimat USA Inc. (link)

After the news above hit the tickers, Light Sweet Crude dropped from $44.quite-high to $43.medium within a few minutes – and some hedge funds lost some millions of Dollars on this move.

Just a few minutes later:

US commercial crude oil and gasoline inventories drained lower last week, according to the latest government survey.link

hit the ticker tapes.

The person who called Riyadh to get the Saudi quote before the official US government survey hit the tape did get the wanted reaction: Light Sweet Cude Oil did not break the $45 barrier today!
(And if he/she is somehow competent, his/her hedges did a 50% jump UP).

Unfortunately, there is yet no line between Rove´s office in the White House and Al Sadr´s headquarter in Iman Ali´s shrine, so coordination for the next slump/rise cycle will take some time and the troops will have to wait to blow the dome of the holy shrine until the required communication is established and any action is coordinated.

Comments

Good Thoughts, Bernhard.
Nemo said earlier today the whole thing was a “Mexican standoff”. It looks to me that the last 16 months have been a monster cluster####, and Mexicans have nothing to do with it.
The whole thing is pathetic and very sad.

Posted by: FLASHHARRY | Aug 11 2004 22:44 utc | 1

very interesting,
Have no doubt the the US troops can and will execute a perfect #10 triple gainer off the 10 meter platform………..into an empty swimming pool.

Posted by: anna mist | Aug 12 2004 0:02 utc | 2

Something else may be at work here….
Is it possible that they’ve held off because they’re trying to make a deal with Allawi to get him to send at least one division of the new AVRN to be the first to jump of annamists’s 10 meter tower?
In other words, are they trying to set up the ‘This ain’t no Occu, This ain’t no Disco, we’re not fooling around’ kind of photo-op? This would be sans al jazeera of course, because you wouldn’t want an independent media around that just might flash up an image of that empty pool.
One other thing…..don’t forget that Rumskull is out there hangin’ around Afganistan just waiting to swoop in as the maximum law man ‘cum aspartame dispensor…. to make sure that

Posted by: RossK | Aug 12 2004 0:21 utc | 3

Its an interesting take on the whole oil issue. Chalabi is looking to break off the shia from the rest of the country. I believe Iraq will be three countries when all is said and done. The shias in the south will be alined with the Iranians, the Sunnis with the Saudis, and the Kurds and their mixture of group will end up being the only true multi-ethnic country.
I think after Chalabi was stabbed in the back by the neo-cons, he’s pissed and willing to undermine the whole thing. he has already been paid and stolen millions of dollars, so he has money to play with.
Aren’t we having fun in that great bastion of back stabbing called the middle east.

Posted by: jdp | Aug 12 2004 0:23 utc | 4

> … who regard the ongoing
> bombarding of the holy Najaf
> graveyard of 2,000,000 buried
> Shia by some 5,000 US troops as
> slightly out of decency.
“slightly out of decency” ? even i found the idea of the USAF bombing that cemetery more than beyond the pale, and i’m not even a muslim.
OTOH, i don’t think that anybody in the muslim world will issue a fatwa against the US even if more outrageous things come to pass. the ideological and material initiative opposing the invasion will be left to “low-level” figures like al-sadr.
i may be paranoid, but is it not interesting that grand ayatollah sistani went to england out of all places he could have gone to “treat his ailment” ? remember that england is one of the invading countries and one of the main proponents of treating muslims like shit (not oficially of course).
and then, the americans want to take that city with 5000 soldiers ? they want to get a bloodied nose again, like in fallujah ? did i miss something ?

Posted by: name | Aug 12 2004 0:27 utc | 5

@anna mist:
Christ, has the U.S. Army activated Col. Wile
E. Coyote’s Guard regiment too?
In executing this complex military maneuver,
what is the degree of difficulty, and are points
awarded for style and tactical finesse.
Inquiring military-oriented minds want to know.

Posted by: Sir Basil Liddell-Hart | Aug 12 2004 0:36 utc | 6

just a compressed metaphore.

Posted by: anna mist | Aug 12 2004 0:59 utc | 7

OK….it’s not a joke anymore….
Just heard on AirAmerica hourly (6pm PST) that Rumskull is indeed making ridiculous statements about how the main objective now is to ‘grow’ the indigenous Iraqi forces so that they can start whacking the crap out of their own people….
Shoot, they don’t even need to send ’em off the top of Anna’s tower…..maybe they should just do a little combo-colorization/’shop job on Al Speer’s old Nuremberg Rally images and float them as evidence that Iraqi forces are ready, willing, able and goose-stepping…
Not to mention the fact that they have lots of really cool Klieg lights too..
Hell, that should do it….one little whiff of swill like that on Drudge and it will very likely be the lead on CNN 6 hrs later.

Posted by: RossK | Aug 12 2004 1:10 utc | 8

Sir Basil Liddell-Hart: Christ, has the U.S. Army activated Col. Wile E. Coyote’s Guard regiment too?
Meep, meep!
Ross:In other words, are they trying to set up the ‘This ain’t no Occu, This ain’t no Disco, we’re not fooling around’ kind of photo-op? This would be sans al jazeera of course, because you wouldn’t want an independent media around that just might flash up an image of that empty pool.
😉 Qu’est-ce que c’est? Fa, fa, fa, fa…

Posted by: Kate_Storm | Aug 12 2004 2:28 utc | 9

It is one thing to read conspiracy websites telling the war was for control over oil and preservation of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. They can usually be discounted as humbug, one man’s speculative delusions. But it is another thing to read the same explanations in an article by a former assistant secretary to the british minister of power, who spend 33 years in civil service!

Posted by: MarcinGomulka | Aug 12 2004 2:43 utc | 10

Actually, I was’nt joking, the US military is above all reproach, in terms of men and machine, and the tactics of laying waste, it is unmatched.
The current crisis, and the sudden “Fallujah Balk” on part of the US command, only underscore the absolutely futile position the US/New Iraqi government finds itself in. The realization that indeed, there is no water in the pool. At this point” military achievement” can only roll the political tautology farther down the hole.
What is needed,and has been needed for 16 months, is civil reform, money, and money, and money to do the things that have been stripped away and thrown away by the incomprehensible incompetence of the US civilian” authority” .
The sordid legacy of the CPA that, has in fact, cultivated an insurgency (by defult) that has an exponential learning curve so great , as of now, to render major military action instantly conterproductive, albete the above mentioned threats to the oil infra-structure by the al-Sadr militia. Little by little. the particulated insurgent groups have forged the methods that both bait and undermine the usefulness of US military power to achieve the stated “goals”.
They have drained our pool —– while we have been robbing their house.

Posted by: anna mist | Aug 12 2004 3:06 utc | 11

The ‘delay’ in the assault on Najaf is down to the US Marines having been made to step back while a hastily drilled Iraqi National Guard unit has been brought up to speed to carry out its role as vanguard in any attack on the Imam Ali Shrine complex.
The Americans are always keen to ‘blood’ their levies, during the First Gulf war American planes escorted Saudi pilots and made them shoot down Iraqi planes. There is a ‘point of no return’ when loyalty to one’s race and countrymen evaporates when one has ‘crossed the line’ and become a proxy executioner for a foreign power.
The use of ‘local’ forces is useful as it foments division. Additionally, ‘civil war’ tends to be more bitter and ferocious than ‘standard conflict’. The ING is not is proven effective force, in the past efforts to use it to fire on Iraqis have resulted in desertions and mutinies. Probably the force being drilled to lead the assault on Najaf is largely made up of Kurds, a likelihood that will further heighten ethnic and religious tensions and thoughts of revenge in other areas.
Sunni Kurds slaughtering Shi’ite Iraqi Arabs is a doomed recipe for stability but America seems determined to press on with the farce of ‘putting an Iraqi face’ on developments.
Personally, I hope the ING is obliterated if it assaults Najaf and that there is sufficient ammunition left over to dent the bloodlust of the US Marines. Whatever happens in Najaf later today, Iraq will still be in turmoil while there is an American presence or influence there. In addition, the fury of Shi’ites throughout Iraq, Iran, other Arab countries, Afghanistan et cetera will have been raised to new heights.
The US military obsession with ‘winning’ bouts is why they are losing the war.

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 3:49 utc | 12

….The ING is not a proven effective force, et cetera.

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 3:51 utc | 13

Nemo: The US military obsession with ‘winning’ bouts is why they are losing the war.
There is an eerie similarity here with
quarterly results for publicly traded
companies. Short-term ‘feel good’ stats
win over a coherent plan.

Posted by: Ramlad | Aug 12 2004 4:24 utc | 14

The attack on Najaf has commenced. Right now US helicopter gunships, tanks and heavy machine guns are pouring fire onto Najaf.

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 4:29 utc | 15

No doubt the rationale in some quarters for using the national guard in Iraq is the same one Gaddis gave on the panel with Gary Hart last week or so when defending the reality of empire and Napoleonic modernization at present while discussing the glorious war efforts past as strategy…
which was/is to let someone else fight the war and take the casualties, as much as possible.
Gaddis mentioned this as part of the tactic of World War 2 (while no “official” mention of the huge number of Russian casualties is made mention.) And no doubt it was also the rationale in Central America and in the Afghan/Soviet war.
Obviously Rummy and Wolfie didn’t check with Gaddis before invading Iraq w/o a real coalition, but reality isn’t the be all and especially not the end all of the Bush junta.

Posted by: fauxreal | Aug 12 2004 5:43 utc | 16

@anna m
OK, pool is drained, house is ransacked….so, who gets the SUV?
@ Ramlad
“…There is an eerie similarity here with
quarterly results for publicly traded companies. Short-term ‘feel good’ stats win over a coherent plan.”

Yup, and you could say exactly the same thing with respect to the Rovian strategy of short attention span news cycle manipulation for short-term poll boosts — and that is why they will never, ever develop a coherent policy (good or bad) on anything

Posted by: RossK | Aug 12 2004 5:45 utc | 17

Hey Nemo et al….
Does it mean anything re: poosible rift with Allawi that al-Jaafari, Iraq’s interim vice president, is still calling for US troops to withdraw from Najaf?

Posted by: RossK | Aug 12 2004 5:53 utc | 18

@ Ross K.
Ibrahim Jafaari leads the Shiite al-Da’wa Party, which is the oldest and largest surviving party in Iraq. Jafaari is a religious man and for him the attack on Najaf and the threat presented to Shi3a Islam’s most sacred shrine is undoubtedly intolerable and agonizingly painful to watch. His remarks undoubtedly reflect the anguish and anger of the Shi’ite majority in Iraq. Allawi, ex-assassin, nominally a Shi’ite but a secular one these days, has not the religious devotion of Jafaari.
I know cynics might suggest that Jafaari’s comments won’t do him any harm vis a vis any forthcoming election (Americans are not the only ones who fear cancellation of an election), but in truth he will do well anyway and I personally believe that he was moved to make his remarks because of genuine, deeply felt religious beliefs and a concern for the people and city of Najaf.
The continuing bloodshed, with Allawi’s nominal ‘approval’, will certainly not help relations between the two men. Whatever ‘hard man’ image the Americans think that they are establishing for Allawi it will be Jafaari’s words that carry more weight with the Shi’ites with regard to the situation in Najaf. It really is difficult to convey the tremendous personal wound that religious Shi’ites are suffering as a consequence of seeing their most revered places becoming a killing ground for occupiers.

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 6:41 utc | 19

@NEMO:
We All Understand, when you speak about “revered places”
FH

Posted by: Anonymous | Aug 12 2004 6:55 utc | 20

RossK
The SUV (stolen) sits outside the cheap motel, where one G.W.Bush has awakened from a
drunkards dream.
The floor is sticky, the head is a throb, it hurts to pee, and he don’t know how he got there.
And that knock on the door now, is that history a’ callin’………….or is it just the police?
As the door cracks open, and the light of day, hits that man with the squinty eyes, he looks beyond bad he looks
Spent.

Posted by: anna mist | Aug 12 2004 7:09 utc | 21

US bombing of Kut kills many civilians
Heavy US bombardment of Kut has killed 56 people and wounded more than 110, one day after clashes between police and Shia fighters in the southern Iraqi city, a medic said.
US planes started bombing the al-Shakia district, in southern Kut after 3:00 am (2300 GMT Wednesday) on Thursday, said Kut hospital director, Khader Fadal Arar.
Many of the dead and wounded were women and children, he added.
“They destroyed 18 houses and killed 56 people and injured more than 110, some of them very seriously,” he said…
US kills Iraqi civilians
The deputy governor of Najaf has resigned in protest against the US offensive on the city while a series of explosions rocked Najaf as fighting between US marines and Al-Mahdi fighters enters a second week.
“I resign from my post denouncing all the US terrorist operations that they are doing against this holy city,” Jawdat Kadam Najim al-Kuraishi, deputy governor of Najaf said on Thursday…
Najaf official resigns as fighting continues

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 7:32 utc | 22

Nemo–
really helpful background analysis; will improve me tea leave reading, thanks
anna m–
great imagery/thought bombs today…you know, had a thought awhile back…maybe the Smirk spent those 70 or 80 or 90 lost weekends in a row in the early ’70s on roadtrips with Blotto. Seems far fetched, sure, but seeing as how JBelushi is dead, I don’t think it is unreasonable to suggest that Rove might build something like that into a nice Stonewall.
_____
BTW – I figured the SUV was one of those nice shiny white ones that CNN and the like abandoned when they retreated permanently inside the green zone.

Posted by: RossK | Aug 12 2004 7:35 utc | 23

US coal prices soar as output declines
In case you were hoping that the Us would be protected from rising oil prices because a lot of its electricity (almost half) comes from coal-fired plants, think again.
The US economy is fast losing ANY room for manoeuver in any direction; same as its army in Irak it would seem.
Are BushCo going for broke? Betting the whole house/country in a massive fireworks display that will drown the election?
(Sorry to mix the metaphors with the swimming pool…)

Posted by: Jérôme | Aug 12 2004 7:36 utc | 24

mix away Jerome ’cause I need a nightcap.
g’night all, sincerely hope and pray that Najaf is still there in the morning.

Posted by: RossK | Aug 12 2004 7:40 utc | 25

a crying shame, the lot of it.

Posted by: anna mist | Aug 12 2004 7:40 utc | 26

Hoagland in WaPo

This past spring Bremer collaborated with Bush’s National Security Council staff on a seven-page memorandum that outlined a strategy for marginalizing Chalabi. This exercise has now been relentlessly brought to fruition while arrests and prosecutions of insurgents have gone unpursued.
Bremer created a secret court, appointed a manifestly unprepared jurist to head it and made sure Iraq’s interim government could not disband it after the U.S. administrator left. It is this judge, Zuhair Maliky, who issued a warrant for the arrest of Chalabi while he was — guess where? — in Tehran.
Chalabi’s fight with other Iraqi factions in Baghdad is his business. But the Bush team petulantly stakes American prestige, credibility and honor on a covert campaign of score-settling against Chalabi, Sadr and any other Shiites who might be influenced by Iran, while terrorists reign in Fallujah. This is not strategy; this is folly.

I would like to read those seven pages…

Posted by: b | Aug 12 2004 7:58 utc | 27

b
and this from hoagland? the bottom of the pool (sorry) has been found.
good night moon

Posted by: anna mist | Aug 12 2004 8:21 utc | 28

Bush (on Najaf): I know what I’m doing.
There’s a first time for everything… Reminds me of Sledgehammer David Rasche: “Trust me, …”

Posted by: teuton | Aug 12 2004 8:54 utc | 29

Sickness
US bombing of Kut kills 75, as Iraq toll hits 165 dead in 24hrs nationwide

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 9:32 utc | 30

Nemo,
Your updates are a blessing and a curse to me.
I want to know what’s going on.
It’s deeply disturbing me to be exposed to it.
Thanks for your help in keeping me informed and conscious. May I use your blessing and curse wisely.

Posted by: Juannie | Aug 12 2004 9:45 utc | 31

World’s Shi’ites warn that US is treading on sensitive ground
Juannie, I may take a break for a little while, it’s killing me. People are going crazy with anger and that fuels more desire for vengeance and on and on it goes. The whole country is bleeding.

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 9:49 utc | 32

Houdini does it again
Iraqi police say they won’t arrest Chalabi

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 9:51 utc | 33

US launches assault on Najaf, kills and injures hundreds in air strikes on Kut, protests erupt in Basra and Baghdad
It is just after 2.00pm in Iraq – the day has more death in it yet.

Posted by: Nemo | Aug 12 2004 10:03 utc | 34

May their God be with them. Imam Ali Mosque, Najaf, Iraq photo

Posted by: b | Aug 12 2004 11:06 utc | 35

Proof that Blair and Bush are Liars and Murderers

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Aug 12 2004 11:18 utc | 36

Today, the myth of the US as a benevolent super power may end for a whole generation or more. In terms of prestige, the US have far more to lose than Iraq. The sickening loss of life and happiness… A curse on the heads of this war’s architects.
Nemo, thank you for staying on line, for having a dialogue. If it is killing you, as you say, you should stop. Don’t hurt yourself.

Posted by: teuton | Aug 12 2004 12:08 utc | 37

nemo….
What teuton said…take a break…come back when you’re ready.

Posted by: RossK | Aug 12 2004 14:50 utc | 38

Proper Media Source

Posted by: Cloned Poster | Aug 12 2004 14:58 utc | 39

This detailed article from Occupation Watch, (12 July 2004), describes the buying and collecting (or should I say fabricating?) of information engineered by the INC and Chalabi, before the Iraq invasion.
Excerpt for flavor:
…Several reporters and editors I spoke with recalled that soon after 9/11 the INC started offering them defectors with stories linking Saddam Hussein to international terrorism. Michael Isikoff from Newsweek remembers going to a dinner that fall hosted by Francis Brooke, a longtime Chalabi aide, at Kincaids, a Washington, D.C., restaurant. The purpose, apparently, was to introduce Isikoff to Sabah Khalifa Khodada, an Iraqi army defector who claimed to know about a secret training camp near Salman Pak, twenty miles south of Baghdad, where Hussein was training Islamic extremists. “It was me, Brooke, and about nine Iraqis,’ Isikoff recalls. “The defector didn’t speak English and I really didn’t know what to make of the whole thing or have any way to evaluate the story so I didn’t write about it.’
The INC found a more receptive audience at The Washington Post. In October 2001 the group brought Khodada to meet Jim Hoagland, associate editor and chief foreign correspondent for the Post, who wrote a column using the defector’s story. Published on Oct. 12, 2001, and headlined WHAT ABOUT IRAQ? It is the first article on the ICP list. (…)
Link

Posted by: Blackie | Aug 12 2004 15:07 utc | 40