Billmon on a politician accidentally telling the truth.
|
|
|
|
Back to Main
|
||
|
August 5, 2004
Billmon: Freudian Slip
Billmon on a politician accidentally telling the truth.
Comments
I posted this earlier on the off-topic post. Posted by: Cloned Poster | Aug 5 2004 20:04 utc | 1 I wonder how many other people will notice? Posted by: Kate_Storm | Aug 5 2004 20:16 utc | 2 Oh, people noticed. Big time. Posted by: SusanG | Aug 5 2004 20:27 utc | 4 There is currently a typo in Billmons link at the Whiskey Bar – try this one for teh full text Remarks by the President at the Signing of H.R. 4613 Posted by: b | Aug 5 2004 20:39 utc | 5 @SusanG, yes anybody but Bush………….. Posted by: Cloned Poster | Aug 5 2004 20:43 utc | 6 Concerned not about Bushs freudian but about what followed:
Bush misspeaks during signing ceremony Posted by: b | Aug 5 2004 20:54 utc | 7 One of the most striking things about Bush’s speeches so far has been the absolute identity of his phrases. (The three or four talking points he inevitably mentions every time.) As Billmon suspects, this could be a sign of his mental stress. “He had only one idea, and that was wrong.” Posted by: teuton | Aug 5 2004 21:01 utc | 8 when I saw the new thread, I immediately thought the politician was going to be John Kerry in his acceptance speech where he said “We will double our special forces to conduct terrorist operations…” Posted by: b real | Aug 5 2004 21:21 utc | 10 Cloned Poster, Posted by: Kate_Storm | Aug 5 2004 21:33 utc | 11 I’m probably projecting, but I think Rumsfeld noticed when Bush made that gaffe, and for the next few seconds it looks like he’s trying not to crack up. “He had only one idea, and that was wrong.” Posted by: koreyel | Aug 6 2004 0:10 utc | 13 I get the feeling that this is not a Bush mistake and that he probably read his remarks the way they were prepared. Not that he would notice, but isn’t it possible that his staff, particularly those in charge of detail, are demoralized/tired and would write, transcribe or proof this level of nonsense. Posted by: YY | Aug 6 2004 2:28 utc | 14 Billmon has a new post. About the new Fox pole and how Fox is trying to spin their own pole. Shameless. I’ve been saying for a while now, I just don’t know who these people are poling. Bushie is look down on far and wide. He is un-elected in the first place and many still have that in their minds. I think even many fundies have turned on him. That boy is toast. Posted by: jdp | Aug 6 2004 3:24 utc | 15 billmon’s new post brings me so much joy. Posted by: annie | Aug 6 2004 3:46 utc | 16 From the Independent: Posted by: Fran | Aug 6 2004 4:11 utc | 17 I think that a few people may have noticed the gaffe when Jay Leno showed the video clip unedited. He didn’t make much of an extra joke about it, just let it speak for itself. Posted by: Duncan Idaho | Aug 6 2004 5:11 utc | 18 Fox is trying to spin their own pole. Shameless. I’ve been saying for a while now, I just don’t know who these people are poling. Posted by: fauxreal | Aug 6 2004 5:37 utc | 19 hey Faux, I think he had it right, as in Fox News is currently poling the public. Poling in this case would be defined as 1.) ramming, shoving, pushing, jamming, or thrusting inaccurate, skewed, twisted soundbites off as news. 2.) The rape of the public consciousness with willfully twisted information. Posted by: sukabi | Aug 6 2004 6:18 utc | 20 Yep: “A one-track mind — and narrow guage, at that.” Posted by: prof fate | Aug 6 2004 6:32 utc | 21 yeah, sukabi – that was my idea too – a Freudian typo if you will. And what’s with this Peter Chernin of News Corp being on board with Kerry/Edwards? Will that trickle down to the on-air talent or at least give us some shred of objectivity in reportage? (naah, didn’t think so …) Posted by: francoise | Aug 6 2004 14:28 utc | 23 |
||